| Milk is Natural, for Baby Cows |
|
|
|
| Written by Kristie |
| Monday, 05 October 2009 18:54 |
Milk is natural, for baby cows![]() Does this look natural to you?
Milk. It's hard to even think of the word without conjuring up an image of a cow in your mind. But why? All mammals produce milk for their offspring. Bears, raccoons, monkeys, squirrels, rats, kangaroos, bats, lions, elephants, whales, groundhogs, and even humans lactate for their young. What makes milk from a cow any different? Why don't we drink fox milk? Like humans and other mammals, cows must be pregnant in order to "give" milk. Cows don't actually "give" their milk, we take it. It's almost comical that despite knowing that pregnant mammals supply milk for their offspring, we tend to forget that cows also need to be pregnant to produce their mammary secretions. After years of successful marketing, lobbying, and infiltrating, the Dairy Council truly has brainwashed us into believing that milk from cows is not only "natural," but some sort of free-flowing substance that cows readily "give" us. Once we come to realize that cows produce milk for their offspring, we then have to ask ourselves, why are we drinking it? Not only are we drinking it during infancy, but throughout our entire lives. So, although we know breast milk is normal and natural for babies, we somehow tend not to ask any questions about drinking milk from a cow past infancy. Even during infancy, milk from a cow is milk for a cow, right? Why is it that we are appalled at consuming the milk of a wolf, or even the milk from our own species after infancy, but when it is that of a cow we don't even question it? What's normal or natural about consuming mammary secretions of another species and continuing to consume it into adulthood? Milk is a very politically charged industry. The Dairy Council has achieved great success through the years in convincing the public that "milk" refers to that of a cow and that we should be consuming it to be healthy. The Dairy Council is even one of the largest sponsors of the American Dietetic Association which gives them access to key individuals who develop nutrition guidelines and inform nutrition professionals. How can an association that is supposed to be based on unbiased scientific information accept donations from industries with commercial interests? And how is it that milk and dairy products became a "food group?" It just seems like the more you step back and analyze the situation, the less sense it makes. We are told we need milk to be healthy, but who is telling us that? And why are people in countries, such as China, who consume little or no dairy products in completely fine health? Why is it that the WHO (World Health Organization) only recommends about half the amount of calcium daily that the USDA recommends? Why is it that we aren't being told that milk from cows is one of the least efficient sources of calcium as far as bioavailability is concerned? Why is it that we aren't being told that drinking milk can cause iron-deficiency anemia?
The more you look, the more answered questions you will find. And the more you find, the more you realize how absurd the idea of consuming milk from a cow really is. This article merely scratched the surface and didn't even discuss ethical issues like the disposal of baby calves (veal and leather), or the various health implications of consuming dairy products. Still not convinced? Do a little research and see for yourself, then you decide how natural milk really is.
See for yourself: Harvard School of Public Health: Calcium and Milk
Milk: The Deadly Poison
|
| Last Updated on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 09:40 |











